Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Cohen v. Arnold Scott Harris, P.C. et al
as 1:2024cv02324
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Cohen
Defendant:
Arnold Scott Harris, P.C., Harris & Harris, Ltd. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
In Re: TikTok, Inc., Consumer Privacy Litigation
as 1:2024cv02110
Defendant:
Beijing Douyin Information Service Co. Ltd, Douyin Ltd., TikTok Inc and others
Not Yet Classified:
TikTok, Inc., Consumer Privacy Litigation
Plaintiff:
Anibeth Bravo, Katie Murphy, Artemis Buckley and others
Pat v. Tribune Publishing Company, LLC
as 1:2023cv06310
Plaintiff:
Arnold Pat and Pat Arnold
Defendant:
Tribune Publishing Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Brodsky v. Law Office of Arnold Scott Harris, P.C.
as 1:2023cv03775
Plaintiff:
JASON BRODSKY
Defendant:
LAW OFFICE OF ARNOLD SCOTT HARRIS, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04944
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv06342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Romero v. Arnold Scott Harris P.C. et al
as 1:2021cv06153
Plaintiff:
Sean Romero
Defendant:
Arnold Scott Harris P.C. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
