Cases 1 - 10 of 10
MCCARTHY v. JOHNSON
as 1:2021mc00004
Defendant:
MICHAEL HEATH JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
HELEN DIANE MCCARTHY
WISE et al v. BANK MARKAZI JOMHOURI ISLAMI IRAN et al
as 1:2019cv00995
Plaintiff:
BILLY DOAL WELLS, D.J.H., LOLA JEAN MODJESKA and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL IRANIAN OIL COMPANY, BANK MARKAZI JOMHOURI ISLAMI IRAN and BANK MELLI IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
LEE et al v. IRAN
as 1:2019cv00830
Plaintiff:
BILLY DOAL WELLS, D.J.H., LOLA JEAN MODJESKA and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
MARELL et al v. PLUMMER et al
as 1:2018cv00354
Plaintiff:
HEATH MARELL , JAMES MARELL and SUSAN MARELL
Defendant:
MARK ALLAN PLUMMER and TEXAS E&P PARTNERS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
SUN v. OBAMA BARACK-DOG et al
as 1:2017cv01861
Plaintiff:
XIU JIAN SUN
Defendant:
OBAMA BARACK-DOG, P. DAVIS OLIVER, BENJAMIN C. MIZER and others
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1006
GANNETT SATELLITE INFORMATION NETWORK, LLC et al v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2017cv01175
Plaintiff:
GANNETT SATELLITE INFORMATION NETWORK, LLC and BRAD HEATH
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
JAMES MADISON PROJECT et al v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2017cv00597
Plaintiff:
JAMES MADISON PROJECT and BRAD HEATH
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
HEATH et al v. AT&T, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv01897
Plaintiff:
TODD HEATH , STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF DELAWARE and others
Defendant:
AT&T, INC. , AT&T CORP. , AT&T DATACOMM, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY v. THOMAS
as 1:2011mc00454
Petitioner:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Respondent:
HEATH P. THOMAS
Cause Of Action: MS:NoticeR
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01371
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
