Cases 1 - 10 of 13
HAWKINS v. DANAHER CORPORATION et al
as 1:2023cv02055
Plaintiff:
BRENDA HAWKINS
Defendant:
DANAHER CORPORATION, RAINER M. BLAIR and MATT MCGREW
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. v. BLAIR et al
as 1:2019cv00975
Defendant:
RODERICK BLAIR, JAMES CLARK and PAUL MAUCHA
Plaintiff:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
IN RE: THIRD-PARTY SUBPOENA FOR DEPOSITION
as 1:2013mc01331
Plaintiff:
GREGORY THORPE and BLAIR HAMRICK
Defendant:
KEITH F. CROSS, JOSEPH F. BENNETT and CROSS & BENNETT L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash Subpoenas
THORPE et al v. CROSS et al
as 1:2013mc00405
Plaintiff:
GREGORY THORPE and BLAIR HAMRICK
Defendant:
KEITH F. CROSS, JOSEPH F. BENNETT and CROSS & BENNETT L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Enforce Subpoena
SIBLEY v. ALEXANDER et al
as 1:2012cv01984
Plaintiff:
MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY
Defendant:
YVETTE ALEXANDER , DONALD R. DINAN and WILLIAM P. LIGHTFOOT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SIBLEY v. OBAMA
as 1:2012cv01832
Plaintiff:
MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SIBLEY v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2011cv00919
Plaintiff:
MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY
Defendant:
BARACK OBAMA and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
SIBLEY v. UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT et al
as 1:2010cv01696
Plaintiff:
MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, JOHN G. ROBERTS, SAMUEL ANTHONY ALITO, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIERRA CLUB et al v. SALAZAR et al
as 1:2010cv01513
Plaintiff:
SIERRA CLUB , OHIO VALLEY ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION , FRIENDS OF BLAIR MOUNTAIN, INC. and others
Defendant:
KEN SALAZAR, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, JON JARVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 3373
BRYANT et al v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2009cv01637
Plaintiff:
ERIC BRYANT and JOAN BRYANT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, DOUGLAS SHULMAN, DENNIS L. PARIZEK and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
