Cases 1 - 10 of 552
S.A. et al v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2024cv02628
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, TRACY TARANGO and others
Plaintiff:
GRUPO MI CORRAL, S.A. and CARLOS OSORIO VAN HOUTEN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02599
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02600
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02604
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02568
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
AZARIAN v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2024cv02579
Defendant:
UR MENDOZA JADDOU, MERRICK GARLAND, DAVID RADEL and others
Plaintiff:
SEPIDEH AZARIAN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
ZHENG et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2024cv01827
Plaintiff:
RAN ZHENG, YIGE WANG, RAPHAEL WANG and others
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, MERRICK B. GARLAND and UR MENDOZA JADDOU
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02115
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02407
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02038
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
