Torts - Injury Cases filed in Hawaii
Cases 31 - 40 of 79
Yonezawa v. Crane Company et al
as 1:2013cv00677
Plaintiff: Paula Yonezawa
Defendant: Crane Company , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Ametek, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant: ITT Corporation and Gould Pumps, Inc.
Cross_defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Ametek, Inc. , Anchor Darling Valve Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Ota et al v. Crane Company et al
as 1:2013cv00389
Plaintiff: Herbert T. Ota and Patsy R. Ota
Defendant: Crane Company , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Ametek, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant: Goulds Pumps, Inc. and ITT Corporation
Cross_defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Ametek, Inc. , Atwood & Morrill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Gabalis et al v. Crane Company et al
as 1:2013cv00304
Plaintiff: Abstinincio Gabalis and Sharon L. Gabalis
Defendant: Crane Company , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Ametek, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant: Gould Pumps, Inc.
Cross_defendant: Gould Pumps, Inc. , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Ametek, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Isara et al v. Crane Company et al
as 1:2013cv00305
Plaintiff: Dorothy Y. Isara and Herbert H. Isara
Defendant: Crane Company , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Ametek, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant: Goulds Pumps, Inc.,
Cross_defendant: Goulds Pumps, Inc., , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Ametek, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Chun v. Crane Company et al
as 1:2013cv00303
Plaintiff: Bong Ae Chun
Defendant: Crane Company , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Ametek, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant: Goulds Pumps, Inc.,
Cross_defendant: Goulds Pumps, Inc., , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Ametek, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Casados v. Drury et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00283
Plaintiff: Yoko Casados
Defendant: Lori A. Drury, Ameritas Life Insurance Corp., Diane Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Albin Rosaldo, et al., v. Crane Company, et al.,
as 1:2013cv00154
Plaintiff: Albin Rosaldo and Prudence Rosaldo
Defendant: Crane Company , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Atwood & Morrill and others
Cross_claimant: Goulds Pumps, Inc.
Cross_defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Atwood & Morrill, Aurora Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Kaawalauole, et al., v. Crane Company et al
as 1:2013cv00152
Plaintiff: Glenn Kaawalauole and Linda Kaawalauole
Defendant: Crane Company , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Atwood & Morrill and others
Cross_claimant: Goulds Pumps, Inc.
Cross_defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Atwood & Morrill, Aurora Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Shintaku et al v. Crane Company et al
as 1:2013cv00060
Plaintiff: Roxane E. Shintaku and Rosei Shinsato
Defendant: Crane Company , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Atwood & Morrill and others
Cross_claimant: ITT Corporation , Goulds Pumps, Inc. and Yarway Corporation
Cross_defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Ametek, Inc., Anchor Darling Valve Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Ralston et al v. Crane Company et al
as 1:2013cv00033
Plaintiff: Wanda J. Ralston and Curtis B. Ralston
Defendant: Crane Company , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Atwood & Morrill and others
Cross_claimant: ITT Corporation and Goulds Pumps, Inc.
Cross_defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Atwood & Morrill , Aurora Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?