Cases 1 - 10 of 18
BARNES v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2020cv01051
Plaintiff:
LIDDIE IRENE BARNES
Defendant:
PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. BARNES et al
as 1:2020cv00531
Plaintiff:
JERICA JONES
Defendant:
918-14TH ME LLC, MARC BARNES and PARK PLACE INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
BARNES v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2019cv00123
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY and WMATA
Plaintiff:
PERRY BARNES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BARNES v. US SENATE
as 1:2018cv00239
Plaintiff:
CHARITA BARNES
Defendant:
US SENATE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
BARNES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2015cv02120
Plaintiff:
VALERIE BARNES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
BEARD v SEALS, et.al
as 1:2014cv01035
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE S. BEARD
Defendant:
KOBIE SEALS and MICHAEL BARNES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Daniel Parisi, et al v. Lawrence Sinclair, et al
as 11-7135
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Daniel Parisi, Whitehouse.com Inc., Whitehouse Network LLC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Lawrence W Sinclair, also known as Larry Sinclair, Jeffrey Rense, Barnes & Noble, Inc. and others
Daniel Parisi, et al v. Lawrence Sinclair, et al
as 11-7077
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Daniel Parisi, Whitehouse.com Inc., Whitehouse Network Llc and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Lawrence W. Sinclair, also known as Larry Sinclair, Jeffrey Rense, Barnes & Noble Inc and others
BARNES v. DOBY-EVELY et al
as 1:2011cv01269
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BARNES
Defendant:
NNEKA DOBY-EVELY and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
BARNES v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 1:2010cv02168
Plaintiff:
LETHA BARNES
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
