Cases 1 - 10 of 17
J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. SOLIS et al
as 1:2017cv01869
Plaintiff:
J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
JOSE ALFREDO SOLIS and GLENDA P. TORRES
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
CRAYTON v. SOLIS
as 1:2014mc01198
Plaintiff:
LEE D. CRAYTON
Defendant:
JORGE A. SOLIS
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
SCOTT v. SOLIS et al
as 1:2012cv02055
Plaintiff:
ANNE L. SCOTT
Defendant:
HILDA L. SOLIS and GARY A. STEINBERG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
AMERICA SAFETY COUNCIL v. SOLIS et al
as 1:2012cv00631
Petitioner:
CLICKSAFETY.COM. INC.
Defendant:
HILDA L. SOLIS and DAVID MICHAELS
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN SAFETY COUNCIL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. SOLIS
as 1:2012cv00306
Plaintiff:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Defendant:
HILDA L. SOLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
GUERRERO-SMITH v. SOLIS
as 1:2012cv00228
Plaintiff:
LENORA GUERRERO-SMITH
Defendant:
HILDA L. SOLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MENDOZA et al v. SOLIS et al
as 1:2011cv01790
Plaintiff:
REYMUNDO ZACARIAS MENDOZA , FRANCISCO JAVIER CASTRO , ALFREDO CONOVILCA MATAMOROS and others
Defendant:
HILDA SOLIS and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
IAP WORLDWIDE SERVICES, INC. v. SOLIS et al
as 1:2011cv01422
Plaintiff:
IAP WORLDWIDE SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
HILDA L. SOLIS , PATRICIA A. SHIU , UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
NATIONAL RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION et al v. SOLIS et al
as 1:2011cv01116
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION , COUNCIL OF STATE RESTAURANT ASSOCIATIONS, INC. and NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS
Defendant:
HILDA L. SOLIS, NANCY LEPPINK and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
MOSQUERA v. SOLIS
as 1:2011cv00950
Plaintiff:
CHRIS MOSQUERA
Defendant:
HILDA SOLIS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
