Cases 51 - 60 of 570
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06478
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Wu v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv06333
Plaintiff:
Yu Ying Wu
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv08723
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Loh v. SUSHIBYM2, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv08567
Plaintiff:
Maggie Loh
Defendant:
SUSHIBYM2, LLC and Yu Ying Lin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 021
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05604
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Zhu et al v. Goldberg et al
as 1:2022cv05458
Plaintiff:
Ying Zhu and M & Y Transportation LLC
Defendant:
Mi Shen Goldberg, Max Z Goldberg and Coronet Ceramics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
ZHU et al v. GOLDBERG et al
as 1:2022cv05457
Plaintiff:
YING ZHU and MAX Z GOLDBERG
Defendant:
MI SHEN GOLDBERG and CORONET CERAMICS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Wen et al v. New York City Regional Center, LLC
as 1:2022cv07383
Plaintiff:
WEN BAI, XIAOLING CAO, YAN CAO and others
Defendant:
NEW YORK CITY REGIONAL CENTER, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ss Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
