Cases 1 - 9 of 9
ALVARENGA v. 2815 M ST, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ALVARENGA and MIGUEL ALVARENGA
Defendant:
2815 M ST, LLC doing business as VILLA YARA, RAMZI ADNAN ISKANDAR and MAJED M. SAADI
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
POZAS ALVARENGA et al v. TORYUMON JAPANESE HOUSE, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00726
Plaintiff:
CARLOS POZAS ALVARENGA and DAVID POZAS RAMIREZ
Defendant:
TAO LIN, TORYUMON JAPANESE HOUSE, INC. doing business as TORYUMON JAPANESE HOUSE and FANGHUANG LIN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
SOSA RAMIREZ et al v. SHANGHAI TOKYO CAFE OF DC CORP. et al
as 1:2017cv02430
Plaintiff:
JOSE SOSA RAMIREZ , JOSE MONGE RAMIREZ and JOSE ALVARENGAS URVINA
Defendant:
SHANGHAI TOKYO CAFE OF DC CORP. and ZHONG JIE CHEN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ALVARENGA NATAREN v. THIP KHAO, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv01060
Plaintiff:
ELMER DIONICIO ALVARENGA NATAREN
Defendant:
THIP KHAO, LLC and SENGAROUN PRADACHITH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ALVARENGA v. PHO DC, INC.
as 1:2014cv00543
Plaintiff:
MANFREDIS ALVARENGA
Defendant:
PHO DC, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PEARSON et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2012cv01737
Plaintiff:
ANNETTE PEARSON , J. P. , CLEO MOSLEY and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
WASHINGTON et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2012cv01544
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , ANTHONY DAY and SHALANA MCCOMMONS
Plaintiff:
SHEILA WASHINGTON , M. W. , CHANTAL MADDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
DANIELS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2011cv01331
Plaintiff:
LASHAN DANIELS
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , NAPPER , H. SALICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ALVARENGA v. FROGGY TIMES, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv00455
Defendant:
FROGGY TIMES, INC. and MINH HIEN BUI
Plaintiff:
JOSE ANTONIO PALACIOS ALVARENGA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
