Cases 1 - 10 of 11
In Re: Restasis (Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Emulsion) Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2018md02819
Defendant:
Restasis (Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Emulsion) Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff:
Allergan, Inc., 1199SEIU Greater New York Benefit Fund, 1199SEIU Licensed Practical Nurses Welfare Fund and others
In Re:
In Re: Restasis (Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Emulsion) Antitrust Litigation
Interested Party:
Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
Petitioner:
Akorn Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees District Council 37 Health & Security Plan v. Allergan, Inc.
as 1:2017cv06684
Defendant:
Allergan, Inc.
Plaintiff:
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees District Council 37 Health & Security Plan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees District Council 37 Health & Security Plan v. Mylan, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01164
Plaintiff:
American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees District Council 37 Health & Security Plan
Defendant:
Mylan, Inc., Taro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Taro Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Sergeants Benevolent Association Health & Welfare Fund v. Actavis Elizabeth, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00980
Plaintiff:
Sergeants Benevolent Association Health & Welfare Fund and American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees District Council 37 Health & Security Plan
Defendant:
Actavis Elizabeth, LLC, Breckenridge Pharmaceutical, Inc., Heritage Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees District Council 37 Health & Security Plan v. Actavis Elizabeth, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv01039
Plaintiff:
American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees District Council 37 Health & Security Plan
Defendant:
Actavis Elizabeth, LLC, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees District Council 37 Health & Security Plan v. Lannett Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00643
Plaintiff:
American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees District Council 37 Health & Security Plan
Defendant:
Lannett Company, Inc. , Mylan Pharaceuticals, Inc. and Sandoz, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Cesar Castillo, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv09949
Plaintiff:
Cesar Castillo, Inc. , 1199SEIU National Benefit Fund and American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees District Council 37 Health & Security Plan
Defendant:
Sandoz, Inc., Novartis AG, Lannett Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
American Federation of State et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. et al
as 1:2012cv02238
Plaintiff:
American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees District Council 37 Health & Security Plan and Sergeants Benevolent Association Health and Welfare Fund
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. and Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
American Federation of State et al v. Amgen, Inc., et al
as 1:2012cv02237
Plaintiff:
Sergeants Benevolent Association Health and Welfare Fund and American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees District Council 37 Health & Security Plan
Defendant:
Amgen, Inc. and Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees District Council 37 Health & Security Plan et al v. Amgen, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv01123
Plaintiff:
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees District Council 37 Health & Security Plan and Sergeants Benevolent Association Health and Welfare Fund
Defendant:
Amgen, Inc. and Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
