Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Montana Wildlife Federation, et al. v. Western Energy Alliance, et al.
as 26-5644
Plaintiff:
MONTANA WILDLIFE FEDERATION, NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION, WILDERNESS SOCIETY and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DOUG BURGUM and others
Intervenor:
CONTINENTAL RESOURCES, INC., STATE OF WYOMING, WESTERN ENERGY ALLIANCE and others
Montana Wildlife Federation, et al. v. Burgum, et al.
as 26-5631
Plaintiff:
MONTANA WILDLIFE FEDERATION, NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION, WILDERNESS SOCIETY and others
Defendant:
DOUG BURGUM, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Intervenor:
CONTINENTAL RESOURCES, INC., STATE OF WYOMING, WESTERN ENERGY ALLIANCE and others
Montana Wildlife Federation, et al. v. State of Wyoming, et al.
as 26-5641
Plaintiff:
MONTANA WILDLIFE FEDERATION, WILDERNESS SOCIETY, NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DOUG BURGUM and others
Intervenor:
CONTINENTAL RESOURCES, INC., STATE OF WYOMING, WESTERN ENERGY ALLIANCE and others
Montana Wildlife Federation, et al. v. R&R Royalty, Ltd., et al.
as 26-5214
Plaintiff:
MONTANA WILDLIFE FEDERATION, WILDERNESS SOCIETY, NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY and others
Defendant:
DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary of the Interior, DONATO JUDICE, in his official capacity as Montana Bureau of Land Management Deputy State Director, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and others
Intervenor:
CONTINENTAL RESOURCES, INC., STATE OF WYOMING, R&R ROYALTY, LTD and others
Montana Wildlife Federation, et al. v. Continental Resources, Inc., et al.
as 26-5197
Plaintiff:
MONTANA WILDLIFE FEDERATION, WILDERNESS SOCIETY, NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY and others
Defendant:
DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary of the Interior, DONATO JUDICE, in his official capacity as Montana Bureau of Land Management Deputy State Director, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and others
Intervenor:
CONTINENTAL RESOURCES, INC., STATE OF WYOMING, WESTERN ENERGY ALLIANCE and others
Powder River Basin Resource Council, et al v. DOI, et al
as 26-5142
Plaintiff:
Powder River Basin Resource Council and Western Watersheds Project
Defendant:
United States Department of the Interior and United States Bureau of Land Management
Intervenor:
Continental Resources, Inc., Devon Energy Production Company, L.P., Petroleum Association of Wyoming and others
Powder River Basin Resource Council, et al v. DOI, et al
as 26-5143
Plaintiff:
Powder River Basin Resource Council and Western Watersheds Project
Defendant:
United States Department of the Interior and United States Bureau of Land Management
Intervenor:
Continental Resources, Inc., Devon Energy Production Company, L.P., Petroleum Association of Wyoming and others
Powder River Basin Resource Council, et al v. DOI, et al
as 26-5141
Plaintiff:
Powder River Basin Resource Council and Western Watersheds Project
Defendant:
United States Department of the Interior and United States Bureau of Land Management
Intervenor:
Continental Resources, Inc., Devon Energy Production Company, L.P., Petroleum Association of Wyoming and others
Powder River Basin Resource Council, et al v. DOI, et al
as 26-5120
Plaintiff:
Powder River Basin Resource Council and Western Watersheds Project
Defendant:
United States Department of the Interior and United States Bureau of Land Management
Intervenor:
Continental Resources, Inc., Devon Energy Production Company, L.P., Anschutz Exploration Corporation and others
Powder River Basin Resource Council, et al v. DOI, et al
as 26-5119
Plaintiff:
Powder River Basin Resource Council and Western Watersheds Project
Defendant:
United States Department of the Interior and United States Bureau of Land Management
Intervenor:
Petroleum Association of Wyoming, Anschutz Exploration Corporation, State of Wyoming and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
