Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Calloway et al v. AT&T Corp. et al
as 1:2018cv06975
Plaintiff:
Bridgett Tift, Mary Hanley, James Bloch and others
Defendant:
AT&T Services, Inc., AT&T Teleholdings, Inc., AT&T, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Seimer v. AT&T, Inc. et al.
as 3:2018cv50200
Plaintiff:
Jeff Seimer
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc. and Fidelity Investments
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Edwards v. Illinois Bell Telephone Company et al
as 1:2016cv04875
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edwards
Defendant:
Illinois Bell Telephone Co. and AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rhoden v. AT&T Inc.
as 1:2016cv03075
Plaintiff:
Glennis Rhoden
Defendant:
AT&T Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Nemitz v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2012cv08039
Plaintiff:
Gregory Nemitz
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company , AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1, AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Vassos v. AT&T Pension Benefit Plan et al
as 1:2011cv04891
Plaintiff:
Mary Vassos
Defendant:
AT&T Pension Benefit Plan , Benefit Plan Committee (AT&T), AT&T Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Casimere-Cooks v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1 - AT&T Sickness and Accident Disability Plan for Occupational Employees et al
as 3:2011cv00402
Plaintiff:
Lawanda Casimere-Cooks
Defendant:
AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1 - AT&T Sickness and Accident Disability Plan for Occupational Employees , AT&T Inc. and AT&T Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Langland v. AT&T Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv04037
Plaintiff:
Jay Langland
Defendant:
AT&T Services, Inc. and AT&T Inc. Severance Pay Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
AT&T Inc. et al v. Constonie et al
as 1:2007cv03333
Plaintiff:
AT&T Inc., AT&T Inc., The AT&T Savings & Security Plan and others
Defendant:
Tina Constonie, Edith Costonie, Abayomi Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
