Cases 41 - 50 of 351
Raymond Scott v. David Shinn, et al
as 21-17072
Petitioner / Appellant:
RAYMOND J. SCOTT
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Kilian Hale v. David Shinn, et al
as 21-16966
Petitioner / Appellant:
KILIAN GREGOIRE HALE
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director
Eric Bradley v. David Shinn, et al
as 21-16965
Petitioner / Appellant:
ERIC KYLE BRADLEY
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Corion Babers v. David Shinn, et al
as 21-16959
Petitioner / Appellant:
CORION KENTRAIL BABERS
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Leo Begay v. David Shinn, et al
as 21-16945
Petitioner / Appellant:
LEO BEGAY
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Michael Sanchez v. David Shinn, et al
as 21-16940
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL ISIDORO SANCHEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director, Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Francisco Felix v. David Shinn, et al
as 21-16949
Petitioner / Appellant:
FRANCISCO JAVIER FELIX
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Douglas Borchers v. ADOC, et al
as 21-16900
Petitioner / Appellant:
DOUGLAS C. BORCHERS
Respondent / Appellee:
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ARIZONA BOARD OF EXECUTIVE CLEMENCY, DAVID SHINN, Director and others
Angel Ruiz v. ADOC, et al
as 21-16897
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANGEL PETE RUIZ
Respondent / Appellee:
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA, named as Attorney General of the State of and DAVID SHINN, Director
David Getzen v. David Shinn, et al
as 21-16869
Petitioner:
DAVID GETZEN
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
