Cases 11 - 18 of 18
BioDelivery Sciences International, Inc. et al v. Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00175
Plaintiff:
BioDelivery Sciences International, Inc. and Arius Two, Inc.
Defendant:
Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Arius Two, Inc. and BioDelivery Sciences International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Prostrakan, Inc. et al v. Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00015
Plaintiff:
ProStraken, Inc. and Strakan International S.a r.l.
Defendant:
Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc. and Allergan plc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc. v. Par Pharmaceutical, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00886
Plaintiff:
Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc.
Defendant:
Par Pharmaceutical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Altergon SA et al v. Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00883
Plaintiff:
Altergon SA , IBSA Institut Biochimique SA and Teikoku Seiyaku Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Altergon SA , IBSA Institut Biochimique SA and Teikoku Seiyaku Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Elan Pharma International Ltd. v. Actavis Laboratories UT Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00291
Plaintiff:
Elan Pharma International Ltd.
Defendant:
Actavis Laboratories UT Inc., Actavis Inc. and Actavis plc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Noven Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Actavis Laboratories UT Inc.
as 1:2015cv00249
Plaintiff:
Noven Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Defendant:
Actavis Laboratories UT Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Galderma Laboratories LP v. Actavis Laboratories UT Inc.
as 1:2015cv00232
Plaintiff:
Galderma Laboratories LP
Defendant:
Actavis Laboratories UT Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Actavis Laboratories UT Inc.
as 1:2015cv00192
Defendant:
Actavis Laboratories UT Inc.
Plaintiff:
Purdue Pharma L.P.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
