Cases 1 - 10 of 191
Adam Delgado v. DOJ, et al
as 24-5078
Plaintiff:
Adam Delgado
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, (DOJ), Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, (ATF), National Finance Center, (NFC) and others
Adam Steele, et al v. USA
as 24-5076
Plaintiff:
Adam Steele and Krystal Comer
Defendant:
United States of America
HALLEY et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
ETHAN KESSLER HALLEY, ADAM FISCHER HALLEY, WENDY KESSLER HALLEY and others
Defendant:
ANTONY BLINKEN, RICHARD VERMA, TAMARA COFMAN WITTES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
FARRON et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
JULIANA FARRON, SHAHAR BAUSI, NOA BAUSI and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
USA v. Roberto Adams
as 24-3005
Plaintiff / Appellant:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellee:
Roberto Adams
FEDERMAN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
as 1:2023cv03752
Plaintiff:
ADAM MICHAEL FEDERMAN
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Elisabeth Regina von Pezold, et al v. Republic of Zimbabwe
as 23-7109
Petitioner:
Elisabeth Regina Marie Gabriele von Pezold, Anna Eleonore Elisab Webber, (nee von Pezold), Heinrich Bernd Alexa Josef von Pezold and others
Respondent:
Republic of Zimbabwe
USA v. Thomas Adams, Jr.
as 23-3099
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Thomas B. Adams, Jr.
Frank Adams v. Merrick Garland
as 23-5098
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Frank Adams
Defendant / Appellee:
Merrick B. Garland, In his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States
STEELE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv00918
Plaintiff:
ADAM STEELE and KRYSTAL COMER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
