Cases 1 - 10 of 17
DOWNEY UNITED SCHOOL DISTRICT v. JUUL LABS INC, et al
as 3:2023cv16856
Defendant:
JUUL LABS INC, PAX LABS INC and PLOOM INC, ALTRIA GROUP INC and others
Plaintiff:
DOWNEY UNITED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv05254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
BARDHI v. WOLF et al
as 4:2020cv00079
Plaintiff:
Adam Bardhi
Defendant:
Acting Director Kenneth Cuccinelli, Acting Secretary CHAD WOLF, KENNETH CUCCINELLI and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. ADAMS et al
as 4:2018mc00003
Defendant:
MADISON TIMBER PROPERTIES LLC and ARTHUR LAMAR ADAMS
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
OCHEESEE CREAMERY, LLC v. PUTNAM et al
as 4:2014cv00621
Plaintiff:
OCHEESEE CREAMERY, LLC
Defendant:
ADAM H PUTNAM and GARY NEWTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
THOMAS ABOOD et al v PLANT PERFORMANCE SERVICES LLC et al.
as 3:2013cv00284
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ABOOD , LATASHA ACOO , JOHN ADAMS and others
Defendant:
PLANT PERFORMANCE SERVICES LLC, FLUOR ENTERPRISES INC, BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION COMPANY INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
STAHURA v. PREMIERE CREDIT OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC
as 3:2011cv00459
Plaintiff:
ADAM STAHURA
Defendant:
PREMIERE CREDIT OF NORTH AMERICA LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
