Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Manning v. EIDP, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00271
Defendant:
EIDP, Inc., E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, The Administration Committee of the DuPont Pension and Retirement Plan and others
Plaintiff:
James M. Manning
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Hamrick et al v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company et al
as 1:2023cv00238
Plaintiff:
Mary J. Hamrick, David B. Beckley and Valentin Rodriguez
Defendant:
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, Administrative Committee of the DuPont Pension and Retirement Plan and Jane/John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Moon v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 1:2019cv01856
Defendant:
Corteva, Inc., U.S. Dupont Pension And Retirement Plan, The Administrative Committee, Dupont De Nemours, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
M. P. Moon
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Johnson et al v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01275
Plaintiff:
Crystal K. Johnson and Corissa L. Banks
Defendant:
Delta Air Lines, Inc., Administrative Committee of Delta Air Lines, Inc. and Christopher Collins
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Gray v. Wilmington Trust Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv00101
Plaintiff:
Julie Gray
Defendant:
Wilmington Trust Corporation , Wilmington Trust Company , Wilmington Trust Employee Benefits Administrative Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Jackson v. The Dow Chemical Company et al
as 1:2010cv00938
Plaintiff:
Mark Jackson
Defendant:
The Dow Chemical Company, Rohm and Haas Company, Rohm and Haas Company Benefits Administrative Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Grote v. Boris et al
as 1:2010cv00155
Plaintiff:
Brian Grote
Defendant:
James R. Boris, Connie K. Duckworth, Alan E. Goldberg and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
