Cases 11 - 20 of 2,265
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01370
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MARONI et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2024cv01334
Plaintiff:
HANRI MARCELL SURIAN MARONI, CLAUDIA REGINA CINTI CORREA PORTO, MARCIO CAMPOS CHOUIN VAREJAO and others
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR MENDOZA JADDOU and CONNIE NOLAN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
PANDYA v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2024cv01321
Plaintiff:
HARDIK ARUNKUMAR PANDYA
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, JENNIFER B. HIGGINS and TED H. KIM
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2024cv01311
Plaintiff:
Hanri Marcell Surian Maroni
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR MENDOZA JADDOU and CONNIE NOLAN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
