Cases 21 - 30 of 45
State of Washington v. Alex Azar, II, et al
as 20-35044
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEX M. AZAR II and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Agendia, Inc. v. Alex Azar, II
as 19-56516
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEX M. AZAR II, Secretary of U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AGENDIA, INC.
John Doe #1, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 19-36020
Defendant / Appellant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GABINO SORIANO CASTELLANOS, LATINO NETWORK, BRENDA VILLARRUEL and others
Ms. J.P., et al v. William Barr, et al
as 19-56400
Defendant / Appellant:
LOWELL CLARK, Warden, CHAD F. WOLF, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, and its Subordinate Entities, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, and its Subordinate Entities and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MS. J.P., MS. J.O. and MS. R.M., on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated
Agendia, Inc. v. Alex Azar, II
as 20-55041
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEX M. AZAR II, Secretary of U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AGENDIA, INC.
Willie Goffney, Jr., et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 19-56368
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIE H. GOFFNEY, Jr., M.D. and ADVANCED SURGICAL ASSOCIATES MEDICAL OFFICE, INC., a California corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEX M. AZAR II, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, in his official capacity
Yolany Padilla, et al v. ICE, et al
as 19-35565
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID SHINN, Warden, EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW, MARC J. MOORE, Seattle Field Office Director, ICE and others
Defendant:
JOHN P. SANDERS, Acting Commissioner of CBP, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, FKA Department of Social Services, MATTHEW ALBENCE, Acting Deputy Director of ICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
IBIS GUZMAN, BLANCA ORANTES, BALTAZAR VASQUEZ and others
Essential Access Health, Inc., et al v. Alex Azar, II, et al
as 19-15979
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ESSENTIAL ACCESS HEALTH, INC. and MELISSA MARSHALL, M.D.
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEX M. AZAR II, Secretary of U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Amicus Curiae:
SUSAN B. ANTHONY LIST, NATIONAL CENTER FOR LESBIAN RIGHTS, EQUALITY FEDERATION, FAMILY EQUALITY COUNCIL, GLMA: HEALTH PROFESSIONALS ADVANCING LGBTQ EQUALITY, THE HIV MEDICINE ASSOCIATION, THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR TRANSGENDER EQUALITY, THE NATIONAL LGBTQ TASK FORCE, THE SEXU, AMERICANS UNITED FOR LIFE and others
State of California v. Alex Azar, II, et al
as 19-15974
Defendant / Appellant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES and ALEX M. AZAR II, in his Official Capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through Attorney General Xavier Becerra
Amicus Curiae:
SUSAN B. ANTHONY LIST, AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE, NATIONAL CENTER FOR LESBIAN RIGHTS, EQUALITY FEDERATION, FAMILY EQUALITY COUNCIL, GLMA: HEALTH PROFESSIONALS ADVANCING LGBTQ EQUALITY, THE HIV MEDICINE ASSOCIATION, THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR TRANSGENDER EQUALITY, THE NATIONAL LGBTQ TASK FORCE, THE SEXU and others
State of Oregon, et al v. Alex Azar, II, et al
as 19-35386
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF COLORADO, PLANNED PARENTHOOD COLUMBIA WILLAMETTE, STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DIANE FOLEY, OFFICE OF POPULATION AFFAIRS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Amicus Curiae:
SUSAN B. ANTHONY LIST, AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS, CALIFORNIA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, SOCIETY FOR ADOLESCENT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, AND SOCIETY FOR MATERNAL-FETAL MEDICINE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
