Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Action Target v. Custom Metal Products et al
as 2:2016cv01037
Plaintiff:
Action Target
Defendant:
Custom Metal Products , Wal-Mart Stores, Amazon.com and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Mothers Lounge v. Amazon.com
as 2:2016cv01014
Plaintiff:
Mothers Lounge
Defendant:
Amazon.com
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
CampMaid et al v. Newell et al
as 2:2016cv00406
Plaintiff:
CampMaid and Kenneth Yocum
Defendant:
Darin Newell , Bold Inc , Xnation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0044
Emergency Essentials v. Amazon.com
as 2:2014cv00156
Plaintiff:
Emergency Essentials
Defendant:
Amazon.com
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Turbo Style Products v. Amazon.com
as 2:2014cv00125
Plaintiff:
Turbo Style Products
Defendant:
Amazon.com
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Denmel Holdings et al v. IXT Systems International et al
as 2:2013cv00888
Plaintiff:
Denmel Holdings and Melanie Reah
Defendant:
IXT Systems International, JS Karaoke, DOK Solution and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
SanMedica International et al v. Amazon.com
as 2:2013cv00169
Plaintiff:
SanMedica International and Western Holdings
Defendant:
Amazon.com
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Isys Technologies v. Google et al
as 2:2011cv00507
Plaintiff:
Isys Technologies
Defendant:
Google , Samsung Electronics USA , Acer America and others
Counter_claimant:
Samsung Electronics USA , Amazon.com , Acer America and others
Counter_defendant:
Samsung Electronics USA , Amazon.com , Acer America and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
GSL Holdings v. UPM Marketing et al
as 2:2011cv00336
Plaintiff:
GSL Holdings
Defendant:
UPM Marketing, Electronic Educational Devices, Amazon.com and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
RG Properties v. UPM Marketing et al
as 2:2011cv00317
Plaintiff:
RG Properties
Defendant:
UPM Marketing, Electronic Educational Devices, Amazon.com and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
