Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Murrah v. American Recovery Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00058
Defendant:
American Recovery Systems, Inc., Keystone Behavioral Pediatrics, LLC and Katherine Dale Falwell
Plaintiff:
Maureen Broughton Murrah
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00057
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Liona v. American Elite Recovery, LLC et al
as 0:2019cv60325
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe 1-10, American Elite Recovery, LLC and American Recovery Systems, LLC
Plaintiff:
Marisa Liona
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv00787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gentile v. American Recovery Service Incorporated of California
as 9:2016cv81649
Plaintiff:
Donald Gentile
Defendant:
American Recovery Service Incorporated of California
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Kalkstein v. American Recovery Systems, LLC
as 0:2016cv62021
Plaintiff:
Kalkstein and Erica Kalkstein
Defendant:
American Recovery Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Garzon v. American Recovery Service Incorporated of California
as 8:2015cv00801
Plaintiff:
Lisa Garzon
Defendant:
American Recovery Service Incorporated of California
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Sellers et al v. American Recovery Specialists of Florida, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00615
Plaintiff:
Randy Sellers and Leona Sellers
Defendant:
American Recovery Specialists of Florida, Inc. and Ronald M. Keys
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv22788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
