Cases 1 - 10 of 11
WOODS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv08149
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY WOODS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WOOD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv13075
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY WOOD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WOOD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22550
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTHONY WOOD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WOOD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv01911
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY WOOD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WOODS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv54412
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY WOODS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOODS SR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv16461
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY WOODS SR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOOD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv81086
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARK ANTHONY WOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOODS JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv50175
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WAYNE ANTHONY WOODS JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOODS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv05768
Plaintiff:
BRUCE ANTHONY WOODS
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOODS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv05886
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN ANTHONY WOODS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
