Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 19
H. LUNDBECK A/S et al v. APOTEX INC. et al
as 1:2020mc00032
Defendant: LEK PHARMACEUTICALS D.D., MACLEODS PHARMA USA, INC., APOTEX INC. and others
Plaintiff: TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL AG, H. LUNDBECK A/S, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC. (TPUSA) and others
Interested Party: ANITA H CLAYTON
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2020cv01371
Defendant: LEK PHARMACEUTICALS D.D., MACLEODS PHARMA USA, INC., APOTEX INC. and others
Plaintiff: TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL AG, H. LUNDBECK A/S, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC. (TPUSA) and others
Interested Party: ANITA H CLAYTON
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP v. BURWELL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv01336
Defendant: SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL , ROBERT CALIFF and FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff: ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and IPR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Intervenor_defendant: PAR PHARMACEUTICAL, INC. , APOTEX CORP. , APOTEX INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
APOTEX, INC. v. UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2013cv00349
Plaintiff: APOTEX, INC.
Defendant: UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION , MARGARET A. HAMBURG and KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Apotex, Inc., et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
as 10-5094
Plaintiff - Appellant: Apotex, Inc.
Plaintiff - Appellee: Roxane Laboratories, Inc., Civil Action No. 10-521
Defendant - Appellee: Kathleen Sebelius, in her official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, Margaret Hamburg, M.D., in her official capacity as Commissioner of Food and Drugs, United States Food and Drug Administration and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee: Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, Inc.
APOTEX, INC. v. SEBELIUS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00517
Plaintiff: APOTEX, INC.
Defendant: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS , MARGARET HAMBURG , UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, Inc v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
as 09-5308
Plaintiff - Appellee: Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, Inc.
Movant - Appellant: Apotex, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee: Kathleen Sebelius, in her official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, Margaret Hamburg, M.D., in her official capacity as Commissioner of Food and Drugs and United States Food and Drug Administration
Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, Inc v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-5281
Plaintiff - Appellant: Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee: Kathleen Sebelius, in her official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, Margaret Hamburg, M.D., in her official capacity as Commissioner of Food and Drugs and United States Food and Drug Administration
Amicus Curiae For Appellee: Apotex, Inc.
Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, Inc v. Michael Leavitt, et al
as 08-5178
Plaintiff - Appellee: Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, Inc.
Movant - Appellant: Apotex, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee: Michael O. Leavitt, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, Andrew C. Von Eschenbach, M.D., in his official capacity as Commissioner of Food and Drugs and Food & Drug Administration
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee: Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, Inc v. Michael Leavitt We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-5141
Plaintiff - Appellee: Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, Inc.
Defendant - Appellant: Michael O. Leavitt, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, Andrew C. Von Eschenbach, M.D., in his official capacity as Commissioner of Food and Drugs and Food & Drug Administration
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee: Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Movant - Movant-Intervenor For Appellant: Apotex, Inc.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?