Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Giamanco v. Apple, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02694
Plaintiff:
Joseph Giamanco
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Mirage Wine + Spirits, Inc. v. Apple Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv03942
Plaintiff:
Mirage Wine + Spirits, Inc. Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated doing business as Mirage Wine & Spirits
Defendant:
Apple Inc., Visa Inc. and Mastercard Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
City of East St. Louis v. Netflix, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00561
Defendant:
Peacock TV, LLC, DirectTV Corporation, Hulu, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
City of East St. Louis, Illinois and City of East St. Louis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Mohammed v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2017cv09371
Defendant:
Apple Inc. and Doe Defendants '1-1000'
Plaintiff:
Abdul Mohammed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Neilan v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2017cv09296
Plaintiff:
Sean Neilan
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mangano et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 1:2017cv09178
Plaintiff:
Sam Mangano , Lance A. Raphael , Ala Abdulla and others
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Harang et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv08500
Plaintiff:
Julius J. Harang , Norbert Hennrich , Betsy Hennrich and others
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. , Rasier, LLC , Travis Kalanick and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2518
Saint Lawrence Communications, LLC v. Apple, Inc., et al
as 1:2017cv05549
Plaintiff:
Saint Lawrence Communications, LLC
Defendant:
Apple, Inc., AT&T Mobility, LLC and Cellco Partnership
Respondent:
James Ashley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG v. Apple, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01853
Plaintiff:
Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
Defendant:
Apple, Inc. , LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. and LG Electronics Mobilecomm U.S.A., Inc.
Movant:
Jerold B Schnayer
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
