Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Arcelor Mittal Tubular Products Roman S.A. et al v. M/V Normandie et al
as 1:2014cv02242
Plaintiff:
Arcelor Mittal Tubular Products Roman S.A. and Arcelor Mittal International America
Defendant:
Western Bulk Carriers AS, F.H. Bertling Reederei GMBH and MS Cantabrica Schiffahrts-Gmbh & Co. K.G.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Arcelor Mittal Fos Sur Mer et al v. M/V Katja et al
as 1:2013cv05121
Plaintiff:
Arcelor Mittal Fos Sur Mer and Arcelor Mittal International America
Defendant:
M/V Katja, Katja Schiffahrtsgesellschaft MBH. & Co. Reederei KG and Intersee Schiffahrtsgesellsschaft MBH & Co. KG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Arcelor Mittal Tubular Products Roman S.A. et al v. M/V Solent et al
as 1:2013cv02078
Plaintiff:
Arcelor Mittal Tubular Products Roman S.A. and Arcelor Mittal International America,
Defendant:
M/V Solent, Western Bulk Carriers As and MS Provence Schiffahtsgesellschaft MBH&Co.K.G
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Arcelor Mittal International America v. M/V Rebecca et al
as 1:2012cv05171
Plaintiff:
Arcelor Mittal International America
Defendant:
M/V Rebecca and Rebecca Conship GmbH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Arcelor Mittal International America et al v. M/V Xenia et al
as 1:2012cv05085
Plaintiff:
Arcelor Mittal International America and Arcelor Mittal Bremen GmbH
Defendant:
M/V Xenia, Xenia Schiffahrts GmbH and Intersee Schiffahrts GmbH & Co. KG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Arcelor Mittal International America v. M.V. Sofia et al
as 1:2011cv00824
Plaintiff:
Arcelor Mittal International America
Defendant:
M.V. Sofia , Western Bulk Carriers KS , Navigation Maritime Bulgare and others
Cross_claimant:
Western Bulk Carriers KS , Sofia Maritime LTD. , M.V. Sofia and others
Cross_defendant:
M.V. Sofia , Navigation Maritime Bulgare , Sofia Maritime LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
