Cases 21 - 30 of 395
FITZGIBBONS v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as NJ/2:18-cv-11243
Plaintiff:
JUHREE R FITZGIBBONS
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP and MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION
MEDVED v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as NJ/2:18-cv-11109
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MEDVED
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, GLAXOSMITHKLINE CONSMER HEALTHCARE LP and others
CHOWDHURY v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as NJ/2:18-cv-11103
Plaintiff:
REAZ CHOWDHURY
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION
EVANS-THOMAS v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as NJ/2:18-cv-11114
Plaintiff:
JOHNETTA EVANS-THOMAS
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP and others
CRAWFORD v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as NJ/2:18-cv-11115
Plaintiff:
DANA ALAN CRAWFORD
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION
JONES et al v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as NJ/2:18-cv-10313
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS JONES and TAMMY JONES
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP., PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY and others
Butler v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as NYS/1:18-cv-02913
Plaintiff:
James Butler
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company , Astrazeneca Pharmaceutical LP and Astrazeneca LP
MONTGOMERY v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as NJ/2:18-cv-09046
Plaintiff:
YULONDA MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and ASTRAZENECA LP.
KELLOGG v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as NJ/2:18-cv-09048
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN J. KELLOGG
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENEA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and MERCK & CO. INC.
MARSHALL v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as NJ/2:18-cv-09037
Plaintiff:
JOHN MARSHALL
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and ASTRAZENECA LP.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
