Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 91 - 100 of 306
Elizabeth Carley v. Nevens, et al
as 21-15637
Respondent / Appellee: NEVENS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Petitioner / Appellant: ELIZABETH CARLEY
Harold Edwards v. State of Nevada, et al
as 21-15573
Petitioner / Appellant: HAROLD EDWARDS
Respondent / Appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA and STATE OF NEVADA
John Farnum v. Robert LeGrand, et al
as 21-15529
Respondent / Appellee: ROBERT LEGRAND, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Petitioner / Appellant: JOHN MICHAEL FARNUM
Scott Casteel v. William Gittere, et al
as 21-15509
Respondent / Appellee: WILLIAM GITTERE, Substituted for Brian E. Williams, Sr., and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Petitioner / Appellant: SCOTT CASTEEL
Ramiro Rodriguez-Carillo v. Garrett, et al
as 21-15510
Respondent / Appellee: GARRETT, Attorney and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Petitioner / Appellant: RAMIRO RODRIGUEZ-CARILLO
Troy Emanuel, Jr. v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 21-15498
Petitioner / Appellant: TROY RAY EMANUEL, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee: DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
James Moore v. Jerry Howell, et al
as 21-15394
Petitioner / Appellant: JAMES LAMONT MOORE
Respondent / Appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA and JERRY HOWELL, Warden
Gene Allen v. State of Nevada, et al
as 21-15388
Respondent / Appellee: AARON FORD, STATE OF NEVADA, GARRETT, Attorney and others
Petitioner / Appellant: GENE ALLEN
Danny Young v. William Hutchings, et al
as 21-15303
Petitioner: DANNY ANDREW YOUNG
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA and WILLIAM HUTCHINGS, substituted for Brian Williams
John Pamplin v. Perry Russel, et al
as 21-15179
Respondent / Appellee: PERRY RUSSEL and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Petitioner / Appellant: JOHN DAVID PAMPLIN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?