Cases 1 - 10 of 89
USA v. Charles Baker, III
as 24-11144
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CHARLES BAKER, III
In re: Rollie Baker, Jr.
as 23-12502
Petitioner:
In re: ROLLIE L. BAKER, JR.
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Arthur CarteeIn re: Arthur Cartee
as 23-10862
Petitioner:
In re: ARTHUR CARTEE
Respondent:
JUDY BROOKS, ROBERT BAKER, MICHAEL CARROLL and others
USA v. Kwuan Baker
as 22-13937
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
KWUAN MONTRELL BAKER
In re: Waseem Daker
as 22-11983
Petitioner:
In re: WASEEM DAKER
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Curtis Baker v. City of Madison, Alabama, et al
as 22-10732
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CURTIS BAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF MADISON, ALABAMA, DANIEL NUNEZ and DION HOSE
Melvin Robertson v. Raphael Warnock, et al
as 21-14481
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MELVIN ROBERTSON
Defendant / Appellee:
RAPHAEL G. WARNOCK, SONNY PERDUE, Individual and Official Capacity, THURBERT BAKER, Individual and Official Capacity and others
Toyota Motor Corporation, et al., et al v. Javier Cardenas, et al
as 21-90032
Petitioner:
TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION, TOYOTA MOTOR SALES CORPORATION, U.S.A., INC., TOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING, INC. and others
Respondent:
JAVIER CARDENAS and RODNEY BAKER
Stanley Baker v. USA
as 21-14346
Petitioner / Appellant:
STANLEY AUBREY BAKER
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rashad Baker, et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 21-14197
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RASHAD BAKER, on behalf of himself and all other similarly situated, RACHAEL LEONARD, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and ZELMA STOVALL, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
