Cases 31 - 40 of 262
Tabitha Baker v. Oksana Sepich, et al
as 21-14145
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TABITHA BAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
OKSANA SEPICH and NAJARIAN CAPITAL, LLC
Rashad Baker, et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 21-90029
Petitioner:
RASHAD BAKER, RACHAEL LEONARD and ZELMA STOVALL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Respondent:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Joseph Hill, Jr. v. Cameron Baker, et al
as 21-13783
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH W. HILL, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
CAMERON BAKER, TITUSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, HOLDER and others
USA v. Daniel Baker
as 21-13749
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DANIEL ALAN BAKER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00606
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Lloyd Baker v. 3M Company, et al
as 21-12517
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LLOYD EUGENE BAKER
Defendant / Appellant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Interested Party:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING, LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE, LLC and others
Orso v. Baker
as 8:2021mc00107
Plaintiff:
Matthew E. Orso as successor trustee to Kenneth D. Bell in his capacity as court-appointed receiver for Rex Venture Group, LLC doing business as Zeekrewards.com
Defendant:
Greg Baker
Interested Party:
Nationwide Judgment Recovery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
Hershel Baker v. Nancy Miller
as 21-12419
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HERSHEL HARDY BAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
NANCY L. MILLER, Administrative Assistant at Baldwin County Superior Court Public Defender's Office
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00449
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
USA v. Stanley Baker
as 21-11874
Defendant / Appellant:
STANLEY AUBREY BAKER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
