Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Viacom International Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A
as 1:2023cv02733
Plaintiff:
Viacom International Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A, Dongguan Kunhong Plastic Products Co., Ltd., Dongguan Nuoyi Toys Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Khara Inc. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2022cv04908
Plaintiff:
Khara Inc. and Ground Works Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, 138 Dcover Store, 195 LT Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Peanuts Worldwide LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2021cv05331
Plaintiff:
Peanuts Worldwide LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", MANmanDanta, Keeplus2021 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv07175
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Fitness Anywhere LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv09267
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Zhang Yi, Zita Binder and others
Plaintiff:
Fitness Anywhere LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Bin Bin Lin v. U.S. Attorney General
as 11-10572
Petitioner:
BIN BIN LIN
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Bin Bin Lin v. U.S. Attorney General
as 10-14216
Petitioner:
BIN BIN LIN
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
