Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Sullivan et al v. A&Z Construction Co. et al
as 1:2012cv02825
Defendant:
A&Z Construction Co., Arshad Hussain and John or Jane Doe Fiduciary
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers Joint Apprentice Training Fund, Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Local Union No. 1, B.A.C.I.U., AFL-CIO, International Masonry Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Sullivan et al v. Euro Construction Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv02501
Defendant:
Beys Specialty, Inc., Euro Construction Services, Inc., Federal Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers Joint Apprentice Training Fund, Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Local Union No. 1, B.A.C.I.U., AFL-CIO, International Masonry Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Sullivan et al v. M&S General Construction et al
as 1:2012cv02089
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers Joint Apprentice Training Fund, Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Local Union No. 1, B.A.C.I.U., AFL-CIO, International Masonry Institute and others
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe, M&S General Construction, RLI Insurance Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Sullivan et al v. United Construction Field Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00682
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers Joint Apprentice Training Fund, Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Local Union No. 1, B.A.C.I.U., AFL-CIO, Bricklayers and Trowel Trades International Pension Fund and the International Masonry Institute and others
Defendant:
John and/or Jane Doe Fiduciary, Shamas Mian and United Construction Field Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Sullivan et al v. Champion Construction Corp. et al
as 1:2011cv05634
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers Joint Apprentice Training Fund, Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Local Union No. 1, B.A.C.I.U., AFL-CIO, International Masonry Institute and others
Defendant:
Champion Construction Corp., Herb J. Chan and John or Jane Doe Fiduciary
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Sullivan et al v. MA General Construction Corp. et al
as 1:2011cv05227
Defendant:
Arch Insurance Company, EMB Contracting Corp., John and/or Jane Doe Fiduciary and others
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers Joint Apprentice Training Fund, Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Local Union No. 1, B.A.C.I.U., AFL-CIO, International Masonry Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Sullivan et al v. One Ten Restoration, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00656
Defendant:
American Safety Casualty Insurance Company, Colonial Surety Company, Gazebo Contracting, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Local Union No. 1, B.A.C.I.U., AFL-CIO, Pointers, Cleaners & Caulkers Welfare, Pension & Annuity Funds, Jeremiah Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Lanzafame et al v. Breeze Construction Inc. et al
as 1:2003cv02452
Cross Claimant:
Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company, Breeze Construction Inc., CGU Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company, Breeze Construction Inc., CGU Insurance Company and others
Cross Defendant:
Breeze Construction Inc., Breeze Construction Inc., CGU Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Local Union No. 1, B.A.C.I.U., AFL-CIO, Santo Lanzafame and Pointers, Cleaners & Caulkers Welfare, Pension & Annuity Funds
212)688-2870 (fax:
Edward L. Schiff
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Lanzafame et al v. Dana Restoration, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00873
Plaintiff:
Santo Lanzafame, Pointers, Cleaners & Caulkers Welfare, Pension & Annuity Funds, Bricklayers and Trowel Trades International Pension Fund and the International Masonry Institute and others
Defendant:
Dana Restoration, Inc., Nancy Dimarco and John and/or Jane Doe Fiduaciary
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
