Cases 1 - 3 of 3
John James, et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company, et al
as 24-3275
Plaintiff:
JOHN A. JAMES, AARON TIFFANY and CHRISTOPHER KOPF
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, aka Norfolk Southern Corporation, BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN, Independently, or as part of controlling or parent entity or agent/and International Brotherhood of Teamsters, BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN NORFOLK SOUTHERN NORTHERN LINES/CF&E GENERAL COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT, originally named as Norfolk Southern Northern Lines, Wheeling and Lake Erie General Committee of Adjustment and others
John James, et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co, et al
as 21-4155
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN A. JAMES, AARON TIFFANY and CHRISTOPHER KOPF
Defendant / Appellee:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, aka Norfolk Southern Corporation, BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN, Independently, or as part of controlling or parent entity or agent/and International Brotherhood of Teamsters, BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN NORFOLK SOUTHERN NORTHERN LINES/CF&E GENERAL COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT, originally named as Norfolk Southern Northern Lines, Wheeling and Lake Erie General Committee of Adjustment and others
John James, et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Comp, et al
as 20-3281
Defendant / Appellee:
BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN NORFOLK SOUTHERN NORTHERN LINES/CF&E GENERAL COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT, originally named as Norfolk Southern Northern Lines, Wheeling and Lake Erie General Committee of Adjustment, DAVID N. RAY, BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN, Independently, or as part of controlling or parent entity or agent/and International Brotherhood of Teamsters and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN A. JAMES, CHRISTOPHER KOPF and AARON TIFFANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
