Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Shawn Manning, et al v. Mark Esper, et al
as 19-5078
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Seager, Nelson Xiong, Jennie Xiong and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Does 1-6, Individual Capacity, Nidal Hasan, Individual Capacity, Patrick M. Shanahan, Official Capacity as Acting Secretary of Defense and others
BOZGOZ et al v. JAMES et al
as 1:2019cv00239
Defendant:
CHRIS WUNSCH, ROBERT WILKIE, WILLIE CLARK and others
Plaintiff:
MARGARET BOZGOZ and AUSTIN BOZGOZ
Petitioner:
ROBERT BOZGOZ
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
BRYANT v. UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
as 1:2016mc02465
Petitioner:
VICTORIA BRYANT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
In re: Bryant Cunningham
as 16-7131
In Re:
In re: Bryant Cunningham
Appellant - Appellant:
Bryant Cunningham
In RE: BRYANT CUNNINGHAM
as 1:2016mc02100
Appellant:
BRYANT CUNNINGHAM
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Equitas Disability Advocates v. Jonathan Feigenbaum, et al
as 16-7060
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Equitas Disability Advocates, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
Jonathan Feigenbaum and Daley, Debofsky and Bryant, P.C.
Mack Lott v. Ralph Kemp, et al
as 15-7087
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mack Henry Lott
Defendant / Appellee:
Ralph Kemp, Warden, Jerry Sikes, Investigator, Ron Cole, Unit Manager and others
Mack Lott v. Ralph Kemp, et al
as 15-7087
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mack Henry Lott
Defendant - Appellee:
Ralph Kemp, Warden, Jerry Sikes, Investigator, Ron Cole, Unit Manager and others
EQUITAS DISABILITY ADVOCATES, LLC v. DALEY, DEBOFSKY AND BRYANT, P.C. et al
as 1:2015cv00611
Plaintiff:
EQUITAS DISABILITY ADVOCATES, LLC
Defendant:
DALEY, DEBOFSKY AND BRYANT, P.C. and JONATHAN FEIGENBAUM
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
LOTT v. KEMP et al
as 1:2015mc00466
Plaintiff:
HENRY LOTT
Defendant:
RALPH KEMP, JERRY SIKES, RON COLE and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
