Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Ahlum et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00773
Plaintiff:
George Ahlum, Shannon Anderson, Kristina Arcutt and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Ables et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00758
Plaintiff:
Steven Ables, Steven Aguado, Jonathan Alexander and others
Defendant:
Zechariah Adams and Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00776
Plaintiff:
Stacia Durst, Christopher Adams, Mike Alexander and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Ackermann et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00767
Plaintiff:
Kati Ackermann, Nicole Adkins, Angela Agosto and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Jones et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00759
Plaintiff:
Samantha Jones, Angela Kelley, James Kern and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Jones et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00761
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones, Michael Jones, Sarah Jones and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Wilhelm v. Metromile, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilhelm
Defendant:
Metromile, Inc., Dan Preston, Colin Bryant and others
Bacchi v. Metromile, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
Frank Bacchi
Defendant:
Metromile, Inc., Dan Preston, Colin Bryant and others
Wheeler v. Metromile, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
Jacob Wheeler
Defendant:
Metromile, Inc., Dan Preston, Colin Bryant and others
O'Neill v. Select Interior Concepts, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01400
Plaintiff:
Shannon O'Neill
Defendant:
Select Interior Concepts, Inc., L. W. Varner, Jr., S. Tracy Coster and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
