Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Kiser v. United States Bureau of Indian Affairs, et al.
as 24-2663
Plaintiff:
KATHERINE KISER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS, TERRANCE JACKSON and DOES, 1-5
State of Alaska Department of Fish and Game v. Federal Subsistence Board, et al.
as 24-179
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL SUBSISTENCE BOARD, DAVID SCHMID, in his official capacity as the Regional Supervisor for the United States Forest Service, SONNY PERDUE, in his official capacity as the United States Secretary of Agriculture and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
ORGANIZED VILLAGE OF KAKE
Eagle Bear Inc. v. The Blackfeet Indian Nation, et al.
as 24-90
Petitioner:
EAGLE BEAR INC.
Respondent:
THE BLACKFEET INDIAN NATION and DARRYL LACOUNTE, Director of the Bureau of Indian Affairs
Intervenor:
INDEPENDENCE BANK
Eagle Bear Inc., et al. v. The Blackfeet Indian Nation, et al.
as 23-4370
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EAGLE BEAR INC.
Intervenor Plaintiff:
INDEPENDENCE BANK
Defendant / Appellee:
THE BLACKFEET INDIAN NATION and UNITED STATES BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS
Fish Northwest v. Scott Rumsey, et al
as 22-35641
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FISH NORTHWEST, a Washington non-profit corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT RUMSEY, in his official capacity as Acting Regional Administrator for NOAA Fisheries' West Coast Region, CHRIS OLIVER, in his official capacity as the Assistant Administrator for National Marine Fisheries Service, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Defendant:
WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE and KELLY SUSEWIND, in his official capacity as Director of the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
State of Alaska Department of v. Federal Subsistence Board, et al
as 22-35097
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL SUBSISTENCE BOARD, DAVID SCHMID, in his official capacityas the Regional Supervisor for the United States Forest Service, SONNY PERDUE, in his official capacity as the United States Secretary of Agriculture and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
ORGANIZED VILLAGE OF KAKE
Samuel Kent v. Darryl LaCounte, et al
as 22-70013
Petitioner:
SAMUEL JAMES KENT
Respondent:
DARRYL LACOUNTE, Director of the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs, DEB HAALAND, Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS and others
Cindy Alegre, et al v. Sally Jewell, et al
as 22-55070
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CINDY ALEGRE, FRANK ALEGRE, MICHAEL ALEGRE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SALLY JEWELL, Secretary of the Department of Interior, United States of America, in her official capacity, LAWRENCE ROBERTS, Assistant Secretary of the Department of Interior - Indian Affairs, United States of America, in his official capacity, MICHAEL BLACK, Director of the Bureau of Indian Affairs of Department of Interior - United States of America, in his official capacity and others
Choc Harper, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 21-71241
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CHOC HARPER, HARLEY REYNOLDS and SAMUEL L. BIERS
Petitioner:
CHOC HARPER
Respondent:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, in her official capacity as United States Secretary of the Department of the Interior, BRYAN BOWKER, in his official capacity as the Western Regional Director Bureau of Indian Affairs, THE COURT OF INDIAN OFFENSES FOR THE WESTERN REGION-ELKO and others
Backcountry Against Dumps, et al v. Bureau of Indian Affairs, et al
as 21-55869
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BACKCOUNTRY AGAINST DUMPS, DONNA TISDALE and JOE E. TISDALE
Defendant / Appellee:
BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS, DARRYL LACOUNTE, in his official capacity as Director of the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs, AMY DUTSCHKE, in her official capacity as Regional Director of the Pacific Region of the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
TERRA-GEN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC and CAMPO BAND OF DIEGUENO MISSION INDIANS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
