Cases 41 - 50 of 974
Moore v. Apollo Endosurgery, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Moore
Defendant:
Apollo Endosurgery, Inc., John Barr, Jeannette Bankes and others
Avenue of the Arts, LLC v. M&T Bank, NA, et al
as 1:2022cv01638
Plaintiff:
Avenue of the Arts, LLC
Defendant:
M&T Bank, NA,, Internal Revenue Service, Joseph E. Carbonell, III and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403 Suit to Enforce Federal Tax Lien
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Javice et al
as 1:2022cv01621
Counter Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Counter Claimant:
Charlie Javice
Defendant:
Olivier Amar
Intervenor:
United States of America
In Re: Request from Argentina
as 1:2022mc00592
Petitioner:
USA
Respondent:
Bank of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
In Re: Request from Slovak Republic
as 1:2022mc00593
Petitioner:
USA
Respondent:
Teodor Bezak and Bank of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Equiniti Trust Company
as 1:2022cv01586
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Equiniti Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
In re: Letter of Request from Argentina
as 1:2022mc00565
Petitioner:
United States Attorney for the District of Delaware
Respondent:
Bank of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
In Re: Letter Request from Argentina
as 1:2022mc00514
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Bank of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01425
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
