Contract Cases filed in New York
Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC et al v. Panzar Boston Post, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv04188
Plaintiff: Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC , Baskin-Robbins Franchising LLC , DD IP Holder LLC and others
Defendant: Panzar Boston Post, LLC , Panzar Tremont, LLC , Panzar Prospect, LLC and others
Counter_claimant: Panzar Boston Post, LLC, Panzar Tremont, LLC, Panzar Prospect, LLC and others
Counter_defendant: Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC, Baskin-Robbins Franchising LLC, DD IP Holder LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Type: Contract Franchise
Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC et al v. Andy's LLC BCD et al
as 1:2010cv02114
Defendant: Andy's LLC, Andy's LLC BCD, Andy's LLC Rockaway Beach and others
Plaintiff: BR IP Holder LLC, Baskin-Robbins Franchised Shops LLC, Baskin-Robbins Franchising LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC et al v. J.R. Scoops, Inc.
as 7:2009cv06959
Plaintiff: Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC, Baskin-Robbins Franchising LLC, DD IP Holder LLC and others
Defendant: J.R. Scoops, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
Type: Contract None
Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC et al v. Shiva Realty of Mulberry, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv06722
Plaintiff: Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC, Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC, Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC and others
Defendant: Shiva Realty of Mulberry, Inc., Shiva Donuts of Maiden Lane , Inc., Shiva Realty of Fulton, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract None
Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC et al v. AN & AT Food Corp. et al
as 1:2009cv02683
Plaintiff: Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC, Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC, Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC and others
Defendant: AN & AT Food Corp., Delightful Food Corp., Unique Fast Service Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Type: Contract None
Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Resturants LLC et al v. Mark and Bret Enterprises, LTD et al
as 2:2008cv01160
Plaintiff: Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Resturants LLC, Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Resturants LLC, Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Resturants LLC and others
Defendant: Mark and Bret Enterprises, LTD, Antman Properties, LTD, Donut King LTD and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract None
Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC et al v. SPS Manhattan, LLC
as 1:2007cv04280
Plaintiff: Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC, DD IP Holder LLC, Baskin-Robbins Franchising LLC and others
Defendant: SPS Manhattan, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC et al v. Chelsea DB Associates, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv07218
Plaintiff: Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC, Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC, Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC and others
Defendant: Chelsea DB Associates, Inc., AKCL Int'l Group, Ltd., KMT Associate Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC et al v. Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC et al
as 1:2007cv02880
Plaintiff: Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC, DD IP Holder LLC, Baskin-Robbins Franchising LLC and others
Defendant: Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC, Fifth Avenue Donuts Corp., Whitestone Plaza Donuts Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC et al v. 1700 Church Avenue Corp. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv02446
Plaintiff: Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC, Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC, DD IP Holder LLC and others
Defendant: 1700 Church Avenue Corp., 244 Flatbush Avenue LLC, Asam Habib and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?