Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Oakley, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv15752
Plaintiff:
Oakley, Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, 6687YJTD Optical Shop Store, OCYCO Eyewear Store and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
BBC Studios Distribution Ltd v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv09118
Plaintiff:
BBC Studios Distribution Ltd
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Quanzhou Yous Trading Co., Ltd., Quanzhou Ziyi Xincheng Technology Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Rafael Marcio Melillo Bastos v. The Partnerships And Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A,
as 1:2023cv04594
Plaintiff:
Rafael Marcio Melillo Bastos
Defendant:
The Partnerships And Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A,, Cailailo, Yuexi Jingyou Electronics Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Parfums Christian Dior v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv04469
Plaintiff:
Parfums Christian Dior
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Guangzhou Woen Cosmetics Co., Ltd., Quanzhou Fengze Hanhao Trading Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Oakley, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv03256
Plaintiff:
Oakley, Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Yiwu Jingmu Trading Co., Ltd., Beauty Life and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Dyson Technology Limited v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv01721
Plaintiff:
Dyson Technology Limited
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Ningbo Lefan Trading Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Wolinsheng Technology Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Bestway Inflatables and Material Corp. v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
as 1:2023cv01346
Plaintiff:
Bestway Inflatables and Material Corp.
Defendant:
The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, deaseighrunfx, dgdra9 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Akamatsu Takayoshi v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
as 1:2022cv06328
Plaintiff:
Akamatsu Takayoshi
Defendant:
The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, ACLE Store, erdongR Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Mercis B.V. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2022cv03852
Plaintiff:
Mercis B.V.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Cartoon Backpack Store, KuiLu Toy Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Dyson Technology Limited v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2022cv01940
Plaintiff:
Dyson Technology Limited
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Shenzhen Shengyi Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing Huasheng Jingrui International Trade Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
