Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Federal Trade Commission v. NPB Advertising, Inc. et al
as 1:2022mc00065
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
NPB Advertising, Inc. a corporation doing business as Pure Green Coffee, Nationwide Ventures, LLC, Olympus Advertising, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 754
Plumley v. MSG Networks Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00909
Defendant:
Joel M. Litvin, Kristin A. Dolan, Aidan J. Dolan and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Plumley
Patterson v. Hennessy et al
as 1:2021cv00907
Nominal Defendant:
Canoo Inc.
Plaintiff:
Claude L. Patterson and Hennessy Capital Acqusition Corp. IV
Defendant:
Ulrich Kranz, Gretchen W. McClain, Paul Balciunas and others
Anderson v. MSG Networks Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00904
Defendant:
Joel M. Litvin, Kristin A. Dolan, Aidan J. Dolan and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Anderson
Bell v. Support.com, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00672
Defendant:
Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc., Support.com, Inc., Lance Rosenzweig and others
Plaintiff:
Brandy Bell
Persaud v. Brown et al
as 1:2020cv01378
Plaintiff:
Andrew Persaud
Defendant:
Richard H. Brown, Mary B. Cranston, Curtis J. Crawford and others
Nominal Defendant:
The Chemours Company
IN RE THE CHEMOURS COMPANY STOCKHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
as 1:2020cv00989
Defendant:
Richard H. Brown, Mary B. Cranston, Curtis J. Crawford and others
Plaintiff:
Brason Lee and Lesley Savage
Nominal Defendant:
The Chemours Company
Palkon v. Cincinnati Bell Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00411
Defendant:
Martin J. Yudkovitz, Russel P. Mayer, Walter A. Dods Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Palkon
Palkon v. Cincinnati Bell Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00244
Defendant:
Martin J. Yudkovitz, Russel P. Mayer, Charlie Merger Sub Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Palkon
Kent v. Care.com, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00088
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
Duncan Robertson, Marla Blow, William H. Harris and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
