Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Hancock et al v. Downtown Disposal Services, Inc.
as 1:2007cv04810
Plaintiff:
Terrance J Hancock, Terrance J Hancock, Terrance J Hancock and others
Defendant:
Downtown Disposal Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Hancock et al v. Ogden Chevrolet, Inc.
as 1:2007cv04014
Plaintiff:
Terrance J Hancock, Terrance J Hancock, Terrance J Hancock and others
Defendant:
Ogden Chevrolet, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Hancock et al v. Windy City Waste & Recycling, Inc.
as 1:2007cv03400
Plaintiff:
Terrence J Hancock, Terrence J Hancock, John Lisner and others
Defendant:
Windy City Waste & Recycling, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Hancock et al v. McCurdy Transportation Services, Inc.
as 1:2007cv03220
Plaintiff:
Terrence J Hancock, Terrence J Hancock, Terrence J Hancock and others
Defendant:
McCurdy Transportation Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Hancock et al v. Sunset Roll-Off Services, LLC
as 1:2007cv03221
Plaintiff:
Terrence J Hancock, Terrence J Hancock, Terrence J Hancock and others
Defendant:
Sunset Roll-Off Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Logan et al v. Nikco Express Transport, LLC
as 1:2007cv02781
Plaintiff:
William Logan, William Logan, William Logan and others
Defendant:
Nikco Express Transport, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Logan et al v. ENO Inc
as 1:2007cv01805
Plaintiff:
William Logan, William Logan, William Logan and others
Defendant:
ENO Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Logan et al v. Tichacek
as 1:2007cv00926
Plaintiff:
William Logan, William Logan, William Logan and others
Defendant:
Gary Tichacek
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
