Cases 1 - 10 of 11
In Re: Groupon Derivative Litigation
as 1:2012cv05300
Plaintiff:
Theresa Monturano , Kent Wong , Shawn Potter and others
Defendant:
Eric P. Lefkofsky , Peter J. Barris , Kevin J. Efrusy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tipnis v. Mason et al
as 1:2012cv03792
Plaintiff:
Rajeev Tipnis
Defendant:
Andrew D. Mason , Eric P. Lefkofsky , Peter J. Barris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lutz v. Mason et al
as 1:2012cv03667
Plaintiff:
Christine Lutz and Groupon, Inc.
Defendant:
Andrew D. Mason , Peter J. Barris , Kevin J. Efrusy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. Mason et al
as 1:2012cv03412
Plaintiff:
Chad Martin
Defendant:
Andrew D. Mason , Peter J. Barris , Kevin Efrusy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Potter v. Mason et al
as 1:2012cv03217
Plaintiff:
Shawn Potter
Defendant:
Andrew D. Mason, Peter J. Barris, Kevin J. Efrusy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Cottrell v. Groupon, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv03129
Plaintiff:
John H. Cottrell
Defendant:
Groupon, Inc. , Andrew D. Mason , Jason E. Child and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Pedrow v. Groupon, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv02791
Plaintiff:
John Pedrow and Peter J. Barris
Defendant:
Groupon, Inc. , Andrew D. Mason , Jason E. Child and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Wong v. Mason et al
as 1:2012cv02682
Plaintiff:
Kent Wong
Defendant:
Andrew D. Mason , Peter J. Barris , Kevin J. Efrusy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Einspahr v. Groupon, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv02547
Plaintiff:
Dennis Einspahr
Defendant:
Groupon, Inc. , Jason E. Child , Joseph M. Del Preto and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Monturano v. Lefkofsky et al
as 1:2012cv02507
Plaintiff:
Theresa Monturano
Defendant:
Eric P. Lefkofsky , Peter J. Barris , Kevin J. Efrusy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
