Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 507
Tablas-Martinez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2830
Petitioner: SAIDA ESTRELLA TABLAS-MARTINEZ, BRYAN EMMANUEL PAREDES-TABLAS and TATIANA MICHELLE JIMENEZ-TABLAS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
State of California, et al. v. United States Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms & Explosives, et al.
as 24-2701
Plaintiff: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BRYAN MUEHLBERGER, FRANK BLACKWELL and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES BUREAU OF ALCOHOL TOBACCO FIREARMS & EXPLOSIVES, STEVEN DETTELBACH, in his official capacity as Director of ATF, DOJ - UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Dade v. Birkholz
as 24-2675
Petitioner: JOHN ERNEST DADE
Respondent: BRYAN BIRKHOLZ
Fergason v. Johnson, et al.
as 24-2233
Petitioner: BRYAN MICHAEL FERGASON
Respondent: CALVIN JOHNSON, CHARLES DANIELS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Misuraca v. Loke, et al.
as 24-2219
Defendant: AMY BRAEUNINGER, DON at W.C.J, JAMIE LOKE, Corrections Officer at Washington County jail (W.C.J.), HARMONY JONES, Corrections Officer at W.C.J. and others
Plaintiff: AIRIAN JOVAN MISURACA
Harris v. Ely State Prison Staff, et al.
as 24-1699
Defendant / Appellee: WILLIAM REUBART
Plaintiff: AMMAR HARRIS
Defendant: ELY STATE PRISON STAFF, STEVEN SISOLAK, BARBARA CEGAVSKE and others
Chavac-Perez v. Garland
as 24-1667
Petitioner: BRYAN LIZANDRO CHAVAC-PEREZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Martinez de Rosales, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1379
Petitioner: MARIA ESMERALDA MARTINEZ DE ROSALES, ISIDRO LEONEL ROSALES QUIJANO, BRYAN STEVEN ROSALES MARTINEZ and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Alvarado-De Leon, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1006
Petitioner: WILISON ALVARADO-DE LEON, YOSELIN ESTER SINAI LUCAS-LOPEZ, BRYAN IVAN ALVARADO-LUCAS and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Bouie v. Phillips
as 24-794
Petitioner: DIRK JA'ONG BOUIE, JR.
Respondent: BRYAN D. PHILLIPS, Warden

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?