Cases 1 - 10 of 417
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
B. v. Bluecross Blueshield of Illinois
as 1:2023cv01206
Plaintiff:
C. B.
Defendant:
BlueCross BlueShield of Illinois and Mondolez Global LLC Group Benefits Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 IDEA: Challenge decision re education for handicapped
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen, Inc. v. SOAR C&B LLC
as 1:2023cv20323
Plaintiff:
Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen, Inc.
Defendant:
SOAR C&B LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Moton v. Garman et al
as 1:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Myron Moton
Defendant:
Mr. Garman, Deputy Houser, Mr. Vangorder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv04175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
B. v. JUUL Labs, Inc.
as 3:2022cv08542
Plaintiff:
C. B.
Defendant:
JUUL Labs, Inc., PAX Labs, Inc., Ploom Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv09472
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 IDEA: Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (short title)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
