Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Michael Chow, et al v. Chak Chau, et al
as 14-14654
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL CHOW, a.k.a. Mr. Chow, MR. CHOW ENTERPRISES, LTD, a California limited partnership, MC MIAMI ENTERPRISES, LLC, a Florida limited liability company and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CHAK YAM CHAU, PHILIPPE MIAMI, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, PHILIPPE WEST COAST LLC and others
Chow v. Chau
as 1:2014mc00100
Plaintiff:
Michael Chow
Defendant:
Chak Yam Chau
Cause Of Action: M 18-302 Registration of Foreign Judgment
Chow et al v. Chau et al
as 1:2014mc00317
Defendant:
Chak Yam Chau, Dave 60 NYC, Inc., Manny Hailey and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Chow, MC Miami Enterprises, LLC, Mr. Chow Enterprises, Ltd. and others
Michael Chow, et al v. Chak Chau, et al
as 12-15995
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICHAEL CHOW, a.k.a. Mr. Chow, MR. CHOW ENTERPRISES, LTD, a California limited partnership, MC MIAMI ENTERPRISES, LLC, a Florida limited liability company and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CHAK YAM CHAU, COSTIN DUMITRESCU, MANNY HAILEY and others
Michael Chow, et al v. Chak Chau, et al
as 12-15994
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL CHOW, a.k.a. "Mr. Chow", MR. CHOW ENTERPRISES, LTD, a California limited partnership, MC MIAMI ENTERPRISES, LLC, a Florida limited liability company and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CHAK YAM CHAU, STRATIS MORFOGEN, PHILIPPE MIAMI, LLC, a Florida limited liability company and others
Defendant - Appellee-Cross Appellant:
DAVE' 60 NYC, INC., COSTIN DUMETRESCU, MANNY HAILEY and others
Chow et al v. Chau et al
as 1:2012mc00757
Defendant:
Chak Yam Chau, Dave 60 NYC, Inc., Manny Hailey and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Chow, MC Miami Enterprises, LLC, Mr. Chow Enterprises, Ltd. and others
Chow et al v. Chau et al
as 1:2009cv21893
Plaintiff:
Michael Chow, Michael Chow, Michael Chow and others
Defendant:
Chak Yam Chau, Stratis Morfogen, Philippe Miami LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
