Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02992
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02793
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Goddard v. Team Soca Bar and Lounge, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02399
Plaintiff:
Che Goddard
Defendant:
Team Soca Bar and Lounge, LLC and Godfrey Lewis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Zuhovitzky et al v. UBS AG Che 101.329.562 et al
as 1:2021cv11124
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Zuhovitzky and Esther Zuhovitzky
Defendant:
UBS AG Che 101.329.562, UBS AG Che 412.669.376, UBS Financial Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Manno v. Campbell et al
as 1:2021cv10642
Plaintiff:
Kelly Manno
Defendant:
Michael Che Campbell, Reggie Conquest, Universal Television LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Manno v. Campbell et al
as 1:2021cv07666
Plaintiff:
Kelly Manno
Defendant:
Michael Che Campbell, Reggie Conquest, Universal Television LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Acevedo v. Che et al
as 1:2020cv05105
Defendant:
Southside Auto Service Inc, United States of America, Albert Che and others
Plaintiff:
Alexian Acevedo
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv07517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101
Yang v. SMJ Construction Inc et al
as 1:2020cv04214
Defendant:
SMJ CONSTRUCTION INC, STEVE KANG, TIAN NAM CHE and others
Plaintiff:
XIAOJIAN YANG
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
