Intellectual Property Cases filed in Illinois
Cases 1 - 10 of 245
The Liverpool Football Club and Athletic Grounds Limited v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv01908
Plaintiff: The Liverpool Football Club and Athletic Grounds Limited
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Dongguan Ustar Gifts Co., Ltd., Guangzhou Pamei Jewelry Co., Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv01887
Plaintiff: Deckers Outdoor Corporation
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Dehua County Gaochuangjing Department Store (individual Business), Fujian Quanzhou Banxian Trading Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Millimages S.A. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv01614
Plaintiff: Millimages S.A.
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Changsha Dahuan Electronic Technology Co., Ltd., Guangzhou Enjoyment Toys Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Song v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv01618
Plaintiff: Yalan Song
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Shenzhen Lishun Electronics Co., LTD, 1Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Christian Dior Couture, S.A. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv01414
Plaintiff: Christian Dior Couture, S.A.
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Dongguan Shengtao Trading Co., Ltd., Fujian John Imp. & Exp. Trading Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Prokhorov v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv01375
Plaintiff: Andrey Prokhorov
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Nancong, Nitrip and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Merch Traffic, LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv01200
Plaintiff: Merch Traffic, LLC
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Changzhou Xinzhilian Information Technology Co., Ltd., Dongguan EL Sports Equipment Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
NBA Properties, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv01149
Plaintiff: NBA Properties, Inc.
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Guangzhou Huanchengda Knitting Co., Ltd., Quanzhou Relaxing Trade Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Jeff Bartels v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv01073
Plaintiff: Jeff Bartels
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Anroop, Brandon Zou and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv00949
Plaintiff: Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Dongguan Boheng Gifts Co., Ltd., Dongguan City Taiyao Hardware Products Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?