Cases 1 - 6 of 6
CITY OF APALACHICOLA v. BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC et al
as FLN/5:13-CV-00146
Plaintiff:
CITY OF APALACHICOLA
Defendant:
BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC
CITY OF APALACHICOLA v. BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC et al
as 5:2013cv00146
Plaintiff:
CITY OF APALACHICOLA
Defendant:
BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC, BP PLC, BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
City of Apalachicola, Florida v. United States Army Corps of En
as 10-14511
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CITY OF APALACHICOLA, FLORIDA
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
:
SERVICE
SOUTHEAST FEDERAL v. CALDERA, et al
as 3:2008cv00640
Plaintiff:
SOUTHEAST FEDERAL POWER CUSTOMERS, INC. and City of Apalachicola, Florida
Defendant:
LOUIS CALDERA , JOSEPH E. WESTPHAL , ROBERT B. FLOWERS and others
Intervenor:
State of Georgia , COBB COUNTY MARIETTA WATER AUTHORITY , DeKalb County and others
Amicu:
NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION and AMERICAN PUBLIC POWER ASSOCIATION
Cross_defendant:
LOUIS CALDERA, JOSEPH E. WESTPHAL, ROBERT B. FLOWERS and others
Cross_claimant:
State of Georgia and GWINNETT COUNTY
Movant:
MIDDLE CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER USERS and LAKE LANIER ASSOCIATION, INC.
Intervenor_defendant:
Lake Lanier Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
City of Apalachicola Florida v. The United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 3:2008cv00233
Plaintiff:
City of Apalachicola Florida
Defendant:
The United States Army Corps of Engineers, Preston M. Geren, John Paul Woodley, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
CITY OF APALACHICOLA FLORIDA v. THE UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
as 4:2008cv00023
Plaintiff:
CITY OF APALACHICOLA FLORIDA
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
