Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Moon v. Richison et al
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Chesley Moon
Defendant:
Chad Richison, Henry C. Duques, Robert J. Levenson and others
Sovos Compliance, LLC v. Clark Associates, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00845
Plaintiff:
Sovos Compliance, LLC
Defendant:
Clark Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ford v. Aberle et al
as 1:2020cv00748
Defendant:
Mark Fields, Donald J. Rosenberg, Jeffrey Henderson and others
Nominal Defendant:
Qualcomm Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Brian Ford
Blonstein v. GGP, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00679
Plaintiff:
Justin Blonstein
Defendant:
Sandeep Mathrani, Janice R. Fukakusa, Daniel B. Hurwitz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stafford et al v. Clarke et al
as 1:2018cv00379
Plaintiff:
Albert Stafford and Jerry Davis
Defendant:
Stephen R. Clarke, Thomas Murphy, Mark Weinswig and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Lutzker v. Clarke et al
as 1:2018cv00201
Plaintiff:
Al Lutzker
Defendant:
Stephen R. Clarke, Thomas Murphy, Mark Weinswig and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. v. Seneca Coal Resources, LLC., et al.
as 1:2017cv00567
Plaintiff:
Cliffs Natural Resources Inc.
Defendant:
Seneca Coal Resources, LLC , Thomas M. Clarke , Ana M Clarke and others
Counter_claimant:
Seneca Coal Resources, LLC
Counter_defendant:
Cliffs Natural Resources Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TD Bank, N.A. v. Minker et al
as 1:2016cv00978
Plaintiff:
TD Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Clark T. Minker and Maureen H. Minker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Leips v. Halim et al
as 1:2013cv00015
Plaintiff:
Clark Leips
Defendant:
Raouf Y. Halim, Michael T. Hayashi, Ming Louie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Berger v. Bradbury et al
as 1:2012cv00824
Plaintiff:
Paul Berger
Defendant:
Daniel M. Bradbury, Paulo F. Costa, Adrian Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
