Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Coalition of Midwest Transmiss, et al v. FERC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-3787
Petitioner: COALITION OF MIDWEST TRANSMISSION CUSTOMERS, ELECTRICITY CONSUMERS RESOURCE COUNCIL, AMERICAN FOREST & PAPER ASSOCIATION and others
Respondent: FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
DC Energy Midwest, LLC v. FERC
as 09-1189
Petitioner: DC Energy Midwest, LLC
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor: Public Service Company of Colorado, Southwestern Public Service Company, Toledo Edison Company and others
DC Energy Midwest, LLC v. FERC
as 09-1189
Petitioner: DC Energy Midwest, LLC
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor For Respondent: Ameren Services Company, American Municipal Power, Inc., Coalition of Midwest Transmission Customers and others
Boston Energy Trading v. FERC
as 09-1006
Petitioner: Edison Mission Energy, Inc. and Boston Energy Trading and Marketing LLC
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor: CAM Energy Trading, LLC, Ameren Services Company, Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company and others
Great Lakes Utilities v. FERC
as 08-1389
Petitioner: Great Lakes Utilities, Indiana Municipal Power Agency, Madison Gas and Electric Company and others
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Movant-Intervenor For Petitioner: Coalition of Midwest Transmission Customers and Wisconsin Electric Power Company
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc. and Duke Energy Business Services LLC
Richard Blumenthal, et al v. FERC
as 08-74439
Petitioner: RICHARD BLUMENTHAL, LISA MADIGAN and PATRICK LYNCH, Attorney General of the State of Rhode Island
Petitioner-Intervenor: AMERICAN PUBLIC POWER ASSOCIATION, COALITION OF MIDWEST TRANSMISSION CUSTOMERS, DESERET GENERATION & TRANSMISSION CO-OPERATIVE, INC. and others
Respondent: FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Respondent-Intervenor: DUKE ENERGY CORP., LOWER MOUNT BETHEL ENERGY, LLC, PPL BRUNNER ISLAND, LLC and others
Madison Gas & Electric Company v. Xcel Energy Services Incorpora
as 08-3160
Petitioner: MADISON GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, MISSOURI RIVER ENERGY SERVICES, SOUTHERN MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY and others
Intervening Respondent: XCEL ENERGY SERVICES INCORPORATED, AMEREN SERVICES COMPANY and MIDWEST INDEPENDENT TRANSMISSION SYSTEM OPERATOR, INCORPORATED
Respondent: FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Intervenor - Intervening Petitioner: COALITION OF MIDWEST TRANSMISSION CUSTOMERS
Coalition of Midwest Transmiss v. FERC
as 08-2893
Petitioner: COALITION OF MIDWEST TRANSMISSION CUSTOMERS
Intervening Petitioner: INTEGRYS ENERGY GROUP
Respondent: FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Intervening Respondent: MIDWEST INDEPENDENT TRANSMISSION SYSTEM OPERATOR, INCORPORATED, AMEREN SERVICES COMPANY, XCEL ENERGY SERVICES INCORPORATED and others
Madison Gas and Electric Compa v. FERC
as 08-1249
Petitioner: Madison Gas and Electric Company, Midwest Municipal Transmission Group, Missouri Joint Municipal Electric Utility Commission and others
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Movant-Intervenor For Petitioner: Coalition of Midwest Transmission Customers
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc., Integrys Energy Group, Inc. and DC Energy Midwest, LLC
Richard Blumenthal v. FERC
as 08-1216
Petitioner: Richard Blumenthal, Attorney General for the State of Connecticut, Lisa Madigan, Attorney General of the State of Illinois and Patrick Lynch, Attorney General of the State of Rhode Island
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor For Petitioner: American Public Power Association, Coalition of Midwest Transmission Customers, Deseret Generation & Transmission Co-operative, Inc. and others
Intervenor For Respondent: Duke Energy Corporation, Lower Mount Bethel Energy, LLC, PPL Brunner Island, LLC and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?