Cases 41 - 50 of 234
Mark Nottage v. Sevier County, TN, et al
as 20-6435
Defendant:
SEVIER COUNTY, TN
Defendant / Appellee:
RONALD COLEMAN, Individually and in his Official Capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK NOTTAGE
David Worthy v. MDOC, et al
as 20-2132
Defendant / Appellee:
DOCTOR JUAN PEREZ, MARY J. HOWARD, CORIZON MEDICAL GROUP and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID ROY WORTHY
Defendant:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Horace Crump v. Rickey Coleman, et al
as 20-2084
Defendant / Appellee:
RICKEY J. COLEMAN, Dr., Assistant Chief Medical Officer, SCOTT L. HOLMES, Dr., Medical Provider, MICHAEL SCHAFER, Corrections Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HORACE W. CRUMP, named as Horace W. Crump, Jr.
Nathan Stiltner v. Marty Donini, et al
as 20-4136
Defendant / Appellee:
MARTY V. DONINI, CATHY COLEMAN, BRYAN DAVIS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHAN L. STILTNER
USA v. Ronald Coleman, Jr.
as 20-1701
Defendant / Appellant:
RONALD LEWIS COLEMAN, JR.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Anthony Coleman
as 20-5724
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTHONY COLEMAN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ted Palladeno v. Gary Mohr, et al
as 20-3587
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN JONES, BRIAN WITTRUP, ROGER WILSON and others
Interested Party:
STATE OF OHIO
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TED PALLADENO
Kevin Williams v. Margaret Ouellette, et al
as 20-1468
Defendant / Appellee:
SUZANNE E. GROFF, NP, SUZANNE HAWKINS, named as Suzanne L. Hawkins, DO, [UNKNOWN] COLEMAN, MD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN WILLIAMS
David Worthy v. MDOC, et al
as 20-1396
Defendant:
MARY J. HOWARD, DR. PEREZ, MR. COLEMAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID ROY WORTHY
Defendant / Appellee:
CORIZON MEDICAL GROUP
Chadwick Miller v. Coleman Prof Serv, et al
as 20-3453
Defendant / Appellee:
JACKSON POLICE DEPARTMENT, COLEMAN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES and JACKSON, OH POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHADWICK LYNN MILLER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
